<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Importance of Protocol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dungeonplace.com/hole/2009/11/04/the-importance-of-protocol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dungeonplace.com/hole/2009/11/04/the-importance-of-protocol/</link>
	<description>Consensual Pain In Your Pocket</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:21:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tutivillus</title>
		<link>http://dungeonplace.com/hole/2009/11/04/the-importance-of-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>tutivillus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dungeonplace.com/hole/2009/11/04/the-importance-of-protocol/#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>Something to consider.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Protocol is a form of service. For some service is a good part of their&lt;br&gt;kink.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another consideration? Protocol can be a form of seduction. A damn fine form&lt;br&gt;of seduction!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefore, I wouldn&#039;t discount the importance at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Third? History.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although I agree with you in the heart of your argument. Sometimes? You just&lt;br&gt;want to get straight to the fun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something to consider.</p>
<p>Protocol is a form of service. For some service is a good part of their<br />kink.</p>
<p>Another consideration? Protocol can be a form of seduction. A damn fine form<br />of seduction!</p>
<p>Therefore, I wouldn&#39;t discount the importance at all.</p>
<p>Third? History.</p>
<p>Although I agree with you in the heart of your argument. Sometimes? You just<br />want to get straight to the fun.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotFormal</title>
		<link>http://dungeonplace.com/hole/2009/11/04/the-importance-of-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>NotFormal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dungeonplace.com/hole/2009/11/04/the-importance-of-protocol/#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>I would agree with your statement that as a community, we&#039;ve let protocol slide... but is that necessarily a bad thing?  While it works for some relationships to be somewhat &quot;protocol-based&quot;, there are a lot of us that just don&#039;t care so much about the formality of kink, and would rather fast forward to the good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with your statement that as a community, we&#39;ve let protocol slide&#8230; but is that necessarily a bad thing?  While it works for some relationships to be somewhat &#8220;protocol-based&#8221;, there are a lot of us that just don&#39;t care so much about the formality of kink, and would rather fast forward to the good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tutivillus</title>
		<link>http://dungeonplace.com/hole/2009/11/04/the-importance-of-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator>tutivillus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dungeonplace.com/hole/2009/11/04/the-importance-of-protocol/#comment-1459</guid>
		<description>Something to consider.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Protocol is a form of service. For some service is a good part of their&lt;br&gt;kink.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another consideration? Protocol can be a form of seduction. A damn fine form&lt;br&gt;of seduction!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefore, I wouldn&#039;t discount the importance at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Third? History.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although I agree with you in the heart of your argument. Sometimes? You just&lt;br&gt;want to get straight to the fun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something to consider.</p>
<p>Protocol is a form of service. For some service is a good part of their<br />kink.</p>
<p>Another consideration? Protocol can be a form of seduction. A damn fine form<br />of seduction!</p>
<p>Therefore, I wouldn&#39;t discount the importance at all.</p>
<p>Third? History.</p>
<p>Although I agree with you in the heart of your argument. Sometimes? You just<br />want to get straight to the fun.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotFormal</title>
		<link>http://dungeonplace.com/hole/2009/11/04/the-importance-of-protocol/comment-page-1/#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>NotFormal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dungeonplace.com/hole/2009/11/04/the-importance-of-protocol/#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>I would agree with your statement that as a community, we&#039;ve let protocol slide... but is that necessarily a bad thing?  While it works for some relationships to be somewhat &quot;protocol-based&quot;, there are a lot of us that just don&#039;t care so much about the formality of kink, and would rather fast forward to the good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with your statement that as a community, we&#39;ve let protocol slide&#8230; but is that necessarily a bad thing?  While it works for some relationships to be somewhat &#8220;protocol-based&#8221;, there are a lot of us that just don&#39;t care so much about the formality of kink, and would rather fast forward to the good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
